Skip to main content

Acronym Mania.

Greetings. The search for answers to the problem of unidentified flying objects has been going on for decades now, with no end in sight. 

A whole slew of investigative approaches and techniques have been applied to the effort to research and investigate the UFO issue, with varying degrees of success. One aspect of the way the public looks at the issue seems on the surface to be quite insignificant, but it has had a strong influence on how the public sees the issue. Acronyms.

The acronym "UFO" has been in the public arena since the heady days of Captain Edward J. Ruppelt of the U.S. Air Force's Project Blue Book. Since the acronym first appeared, and began to be used by the greater UFO community, the term has become synonymous with all things extraterrestrial. Nowadays, anything that carries the label "UFO" is immediately assumed and/or determined, despite a lack of evidence or investigation, to be alien in nature, no matter what.


The National Investigations Committee on Aerial Phenomena (NICAP) and the Mutual UFO Network (MUFON) have both used, or now use in the case of MUFON, the acronym "UFO." Coral Lorenzen, the head of the Aerial Phenomena Research Organization (APRO) preferred the acronym "UAP," an acronym which at the time meant unidentified aerial phenomena, but that particular acronym did not catch on with the general public, or the UFO community. For the past few years, the U.S. government/military has been pushing for the usage of the acronym "UAP," which now means unidentified anomalous phenomena. Despite this push, some UFO writers and researchers prefer to use the old acronym, instead of the new offering. I myself am in that same camp. I use the acronym "UFO" or the term flying saucer. Call me old-fashioned, but that's my professional preference. 

Beyond the preferences, I have often lamented the fact that none of the aforementioned acronyms accurately describe the phenomenon. All have shortcomings. All are not completely accurate or descriptive in nature. To be honest, a single acronym may not suffice. A few years ago, I wrote a poll question that made the following inquiry, "What acronym accurately describes the enigma of unidentified flying objects?" I received a whole range of responses from my readers, most reasonable and thoughtful, but all coming up just a bit short, in my humble opinion. It seems a somewhat inconsequential point, but how a subject matter is seen by the general public or the scientific community is important and can either be a positive or a negative thing, depending on the label being used most often. 

It is a minor point, but it may be a point that carries quite a bit of weight. Even if some answers to the UFO problem come to light, a completely accurate and descriptive acronym may be beyond us, which may speak volumes about the UFO issue, and it's spectacular diversity. 

Thank you for your time and consideration. 

Comments

  1. AnonymousOctober 22, 2023 at 6:13 PM

    Want to improve the way the topic appears to the general public? Start with improving the way people present their evidence... oh, I'm sorry, I mean their truth.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Liars, Frauds, and Misrepresenters.

Greetings. I am occasionally asked why I write about so many of the troubling issues within the UFO subculture. One reason, actually two. One, because the troubling issues exist, and I cannot in good conscience simply ignore them. Two, I am passionate about the UFO question, and I care deeply about the integrity of the entire UFO subculture, even though I am not an active participant in the movement.  There are many outstanding people involved in UFO research, individuals with integrity, an unshakable commitment to the work, and a high level of professionalism. They consistently grind the research stone in the never-ending effort to solve, or at the very least, learn about the UFO problem and it's innumerable questions. I cannot offer enough kind words of support and encouragement to those people, they are all deserving of our accolades, for they conduct their workmanlike efforts behind the scenes, without attention, out of the limelight, and beyond the prying eyes of the UFO subcu
11 comments
Read more

Cringeworthy Promotion, Dolan Style.

Greetings. Mr. Richard Dolan is one of the most well-known figures in the UFO subculture. Known as a historian of the UFO topic, Mr. Dolan has commented at length about the UFO problem on various platforms, on broadcast media, during his own show, and on various social media outlets.  Mr. Dolan is a highly active participant on the UFO circuit, making appearances at many UFO themed festivals and conferences, actively promoting himself throughout. Now the simple act of promotion is not necessarily a negative course of action, but it is strongly suggestive of a change of course. In UFO circles, the act of self-promotion is a slippery slope, one that many well-known public figures have fallen into, some seemingly by accident, others by choice. Mr. Dolan seems to have chosen his course of action, and is apparently quite comfortable in his new surroundings.   Some UFO researchers have lost their professional credibility and integrity in the name of fame, notoriety, and financial gain. It ha
5 comments
Read more

MUFON: Peddling Nonsense or Unknowingly Ignorant?

Greetings. The Mutual UFO Network (MUFON) was once a legitimate investigative organization. Back in the 1970's, the organization worked alongside, but not in cooperation with, the Aerial Phenomena Research Organization (APRO) and the National Investigations Committee on Aerial Phenomena (NICAP.) By the 1990's, MUFON was the only game left in town, with APRO and NICAP having passed into UFO history. In recent years, the organization's focus has shifted away from UFO investigations towards the UFO entertainment industry and the nonsensical content it embraces. The organization has experienced several setbacks in recent years, self-inflicted wounds that tended to occur at the upper echelons of the organization, with the names Jan Harzan, John Ventre, and Steve Hudgeons immediately coming to mind. Despite this situation, there are several local chapters that have maintained a level of investigative focus and legitimacy, keeping the chaos of the higher organization at arm's
12 comments
Read more