Skip to main content

Where Have Daylight Disks Gone?

Greetings. Once upon a time, back in the heady days of the Aerial Phenomena Research Organization and the National Investigations Committee on Aerial Phenomena, the reporting of daylight disks was a relatively common occurrence. In fact, the reporting of such events happened on a worldwide basis, with people all around the planet seeing UFOs that fit into the daylight disk category. Coral and Jim Lorenzen of ARPO received daylight disk sighting reports year after year, as did the staffs at NICAP, and the numerous other lesser-known civilian investigative efforts. The McMinnville event of May 1950 and the Rex Heflin event of August 1965 are prime historical examples of daylight disks. 

As the decades slowly passed, many other categories of UFOs began to grow in reported numbers, with nocturnal lights reported by witnesses on a more consistent basis. By the late 1980's, when the Mutual UFO Network became the sole civilian investigative organization in operation, the situation had completely changed, with daylight disks having become amongst the least reported type of UFO. To be sure, we still had daylight sightings like the Stephenville, Texas events of January 2008 and the Chicago O'Hare event of November 2006, but the phenomena had become a far more nocturnal enigma, with nocturnal lights and other such similar occurrences being the norm.

Similarly to the lack of modern landing cases, which I wrote about several months ago, the overall decline in the reporting of daylight disks adds to the mystery of unidentified flying objects. The specific reasons for the decline escape me, but I am willing to speculate a bit to consider some possibilities. Have media influences; movies, television shows, etc..., had a direct effect on how the general public, specifically witnesses, views the UFO problem? If we assume that a few UFO reports are examples of non-terrestrial visitation, which I am admittedly not comfortable doing, has there been a change in the technology people are witnessing? Have daylight disks always been a part of the UFO situation, but other aspects have become more visible as the decades have passed? I have not the foggiest idea what the ultimate answer is, but one possibility sticks in the recesses of my mind. Perhaps nothing has changed with the phenomena, the only change being what witnesses have managed to see and report. 

As a result of the reticence of witnesses to report their events, the information available for researchers to examine and investigate is sketchy and incomplete. This incomplete data set makes the declaration of patterns a tricky proposition, since there is so much we just don't know. Our beliefs and thoughts about how the phenomena has changed may be completely off target, and that just adds to the enigma, adds to the mystery. Logically that means that the title and subject of this entire blog may be unnecessary, for there may not have been any change in the phenomena. No change at all.

Thank you for your time and consideration. 

Comments

  1. Good theories William, thanks for sharing your views...👽

    ReplyDelete
  2. Thanks for your interest Sir, my theories are likely not defensible, as they are just opinions.

    ReplyDelete
  3. This question has to have an answer. Such a great question.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Liars, Frauds, and Misrepresenters.

Greetings. I am occasionally asked why I write about so many of the troubling issues within the UFO subculture. One reason, actually two. One, because the troubling issues exist, and I cannot in good conscience simply ignore them. Two, I am passionate about the UFO question, and I care deeply about the integrity of the entire UFO subculture, even though I am not an active participant in the movement.  There are many outstanding people involved in UFO research, individuals with integrity, an unshakable commitment to the work, and a high level of professionalism. They consistently grind the research stone in the never-ending effort to solve, or at the very least, learn about the UFO problem and it's innumerable questions. I cannot offer enough kind words of support and encouragement to those people, they are all deserving of our accolades, for they conduct their workmanlike efforts behind the scenes, without attention, out of the limelight, and beyond the prying eyes of the UFO subcu

Cringeworthy Promotion, Dolan Style.

Greetings. Mr. Richard Dolan is one of the most well-known figures in the UFO subculture. Known as a historian of the UFO topic, Mr. Dolan has commented at length about the UFO problem on various platforms, on broadcast media, during his own show, and on various social media outlets.  Mr. Dolan is a highly active participant on the UFO circuit, making appearances at many UFO themed festivals and conferences, actively promoting himself throughout. Now the simple act of promotion is not necessarily a negative course of action, but it is strongly suggestive of a change of course. In UFO circles, the act of self-promotion is a slippery slope, one that many well-known public figures have fallen into, some seemingly by accident, others by choice. Mr. Dolan seems to have chosen his course of action, and is apparently quite comfortable in his new surroundings.   Some UFO researchers have lost their professional credibility and integrity in the name of fame, notoriety, and financial gain. It ha

MUFON: Peddling Nonsense or Unknowingly Ignorant?

Greetings. The Mutual UFO Network (MUFON) was once a legitimate investigative organization. Back in the 1970's, the organization worked alongside, but not in cooperation with, the Aerial Phenomena Research Organization (APRO) and the National Investigations Committee on Aerial Phenomena (NICAP.) By the 1990's, MUFON was the only game left in town, with APRO and NICAP having passed into UFO history. In recent years, the organization's focus has shifted away from UFO investigations towards the UFO entertainment industry and the nonsensical content it embraces. The organization has experienced several setbacks in recent years, self-inflicted wounds that tended to occur at the upper echelons of the organization, with the names Jan Harzan, John Ventre, and Steve Hudgeons immediately coming to mind. Despite this situation, there are several local chapters that have maintained a level of investigative focus and legitimacy, keeping the chaos of the higher organization at arm's