Skip to main content

Unconfirmed Flying Stories.

Greetings. The onus is on the claimant to provide proof to validate their claims. That is the way it works, unless you are a member of the UFO subculture. According to UFO people, the onus is on the researcher to disprove the validity of a person's story. 

The history of the UFO phenomenon makes for a fascinating examination, with multiple nooks and crannies which lead to lesser-known cases, interesting people, and overlooked situations. One aspect of the genre's long and storied history becomes readily apparent after only a short time: unconfirmed and unsubstantiated claims are made all the time, and no proof ever surfaces to validate them, yet such stories are believed. It has always been this way, and it always will.

The late Leonard H. Stringfield (1920-1994) forged a long career of UFO investigations, self-publishing a series of "Status Reports" that focused on alleged crash retrievals. Mr. Stringfield served as a public relations advisor for the National Investigations Committee on Aerial Phenomena back in the late 1950's, and was an "Early Warning Coordinator" for the infamous Condon Committee between 1967 and 1969. Mr. Stringfield's "Status Reports" contained stories from alleged witnesses concerning crash retrieval events, with very few of the alleged witnesses being first-hand in nature. In addition, and this is the focus of this particular writing, Mr. Stringfield did not provide any names or specific details which would allow for an investigation of the alleged witnesses. No specific details, nothing of any substance, just stories. 

Mr. Stringfield is held in high regard by many in the UFO subculture, which speaks volumes about their willingness to accept unconfirmed information. Would any attorney accept information from unidentified sources? Would any scientist accept data from such unknown sources? Would any of us blindly accept information from total strangers on the street? In a word, no. So why is the standard so different when it comes to the UFO topic? Why are so many in the UFO subculture, including researchers, so unwilling to question the information contained within Mr. Stringfield's "Status Reports?" I cannot and will not speculate about the situation as it pertains to personal motivations, but I do have some thoughts about the situation. 

When specific details like dates, names, and qualifications are not provided, it is virtually impossible to conduct an investigation into the alleged individual, the alleged witness. It can be incredibly difficult to confirm the actual existence of the witness, much less their involvement in their claimed events. Its akin to allowing a masked person the opportunity to give testimony in a criminal trial, with neither side knowing who the masked person is, both sides being unable to vet the person, or their testimony. Such an scenario would never take place in a court of law, yet in the UFO subculture, such troubling issues are of no importance, none whatsoever. If information about UFOs is out there, no pun intended, then it will be believed and wholeheartedly embraced. 

Without a vetting process having been undertaken, how can any such unconfirmed and unsubstantiated information be considered reliable? Should any such information be taken at face value by researchers? Absolutely not, for the acceptance of such information is professionally sloppy and incredibly irresponsible, regardless of the field of study.  

Thank you for your time and consideration. 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Liars, Frauds, and Misrepresenters.

Greetings. I am occasionally asked why I write about so many of the troubling issues within the UFO subculture. One reason, actually two. One, because the troubling issues exist, and I cannot in good conscience simply ignore them. Two, I am passionate about the UFO question, and I care deeply about the integrity of the entire UFO subculture, even though I am not an active participant in the movement.  There are many outstanding people involved in UFO research, individuals with integrity, an unshakable commitment to the work, and a high level of professionalism. They consistently grind the research stone in the never-ending effort to solve, or at the very least, learn about the UFO problem and it's innumerable questions. I cannot offer enough kind words of support and encouragement to those people, they are all deserving of our accolades, for they conduct their workmanlike efforts behind the scenes, without attention, out of the limelight, and beyond the prying eyes of the UFO subcu
11 comments
Read more

Cringeworthy Promotion, Dolan Style.

Greetings. Mr. Richard Dolan is one of the most well-known figures in the UFO subculture. Known as a historian of the UFO topic, Mr. Dolan has commented at length about the UFO problem on various platforms, on broadcast media, during his own show, and on various social media outlets.  Mr. Dolan is a highly active participant on the UFO circuit, making appearances at many UFO themed festivals and conferences, actively promoting himself throughout. Now the simple act of promotion is not necessarily a negative course of action, but it is strongly suggestive of a change of course. In UFO circles, the act of self-promotion is a slippery slope, one that many well-known public figures have fallen into, some seemingly by accident, others by choice. Mr. Dolan seems to have chosen his course of action, and is apparently quite comfortable in his new surroundings.   Some UFO researchers have lost their professional credibility and integrity in the name of fame, notoriety, and financial gain. It ha
5 comments
Read more

MUFON: Peddling Nonsense or Unknowingly Ignorant?

Greetings. The Mutual UFO Network (MUFON) was once a legitimate investigative organization. Back in the 1970's, the organization worked alongside, but not in cooperation with, the Aerial Phenomena Research Organization (APRO) and the National Investigations Committee on Aerial Phenomena (NICAP.) By the 1990's, MUFON was the only game left in town, with APRO and NICAP having passed into UFO history. In recent years, the organization's focus has shifted away from UFO investigations towards the UFO entertainment industry and the nonsensical content it embraces. The organization has experienced several setbacks in recent years, self-inflicted wounds that tended to occur at the upper echelons of the organization, with the names Jan Harzan, John Ventre, and Steve Hudgeons immediately coming to mind. Despite this situation, there are several local chapters that have maintained a level of investigative focus and legitimacy, keeping the chaos of the higher organization at arm's
12 comments
Read more