Skip to main content

Mr. Hopkins, Where is the Evidence?

Greetings. The abduction enigma. For many people, the term abduction brings to mind a eerily familiar set of events, with the details well-known to the UFO subculture, and of note, to the general public. 

"Everything I have learned in twenty years of research into the UFO abduction phenomenon leads me to conclude that the aliens' central purpose is not to teach us about taking better care of the environment. Instead, all of the evidence points to their being here to carry out a complex breeding experiment in which they seem to be working to create a hybrid species, a mix of human and alien characteristics. A careful reading of the various witnesses' accounts suggests that here, as in many earlier cases, reproductive issues appear far more frequently than alien ecological concerns."

The above quote is from Budd Hopkins' 1996 book entitled "Witnessed: The True Story of the Brooklyn Bridge UFO Abductions." Elliot Budd Hopkins (1931-2011) was an author, artist, and ufologist, and may have been the most prominent researcher of the abduction enigma. When I first read Mr. Hopkins' book, which I found to be a well constructed piece of UFO literature, one question came to mind: Where is the evidence? I still have that question in my old cranium, unanswered to this day. 

There are literally hundreds of abduction cases on the books, with some cases having attained legendary status. The UFO subculture wholeheartedly embraces the theory of alien abduction, and vigorously pushes back against other more likely, mundane, and reasonable possibilities. Such was the situation during Mr. Hopkins' heyday, and such is the situation now in 2024. However, my question remains unanswered. Where is the evidence? Not anecdotal testimonials, not information gathered from hypnotic regression sessions, not subjective opinions or declarations about the anecdotal. Physical, tangible evidence which can be examined and scrutinized by multiple, independent researchers, including people who have no interest in the UFO problem. 

I have yet to come across a medical report or a scientific summary which describes in detail, a thorough examination of such evidence. I have not been able to locate any such documentation, paperwork which would go a long, long way towards legitimizing the abduction question, and the "work" of abduction researchers like Mr. Hopkins, the late John Mack, Peter Robbins, and David Jacobs. Transparency and openness would go a long way, but all we have are researchers' claims and witnesses' stories, nothing tangible, nothing of substance. Sounds familiar doesn't it?

As far as my own thoughts on the abduction question, I hold the position that alien abductions have indeed taken place, but only on a few, incredibly rare occasions. However, I have no proof or evidence to support my opinion, so my thoughts are of no consequence, none whatsoever. 

Some evidence would be nice, but alas....

Thank you for your time and consideration. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Liars, Frauds, and Misrepresenters.

Greetings. I am occasionally asked why I write about so many of the troubling issues within the UFO subculture. One reason, actually two. One, because the troubling issues exist, and I cannot in good conscience simply ignore them. Two, I am passionate about the UFO question, and I care deeply about the integrity of the entire UFO subculture, even though I am not an active participant in the movement.  There are many outstanding people involved in UFO research, individuals with integrity, an unshakable commitment to the work, and a high level of professionalism. They consistently grind the research stone in the never-ending effort to solve, or at the very least, learn about the UFO problem and it's innumerable questions. I cannot offer enough kind words of support and encouragement to those people, they are all deserving of our accolades, for they conduct their workmanlike efforts behind the scenes, without attention, out of the limelight, and beyond the prying eyes of the UFO subcu

Cringeworthy Promotion, Dolan Style.

Greetings. Mr. Richard Dolan is one of the most well-known figures in the UFO subculture. Known as a historian of the UFO topic, Mr. Dolan has commented at length about the UFO problem on various platforms, on broadcast media, during his own show, and on various social media outlets.  Mr. Dolan is a highly active participant on the UFO circuit, making appearances at many UFO themed festivals and conferences, actively promoting himself throughout. Now the simple act of promotion is not necessarily a negative course of action, but it is strongly suggestive of a change of course. In UFO circles, the act of self-promotion is a slippery slope, one that many well-known public figures have fallen into, some seemingly by accident, others by choice. Mr. Dolan seems to have chosen his course of action, and is apparently quite comfortable in his new surroundings.   Some UFO researchers have lost their professional credibility and integrity in the name of fame, notoriety, and financial gain. It ha

MUFON: Peddling Nonsense or Unknowingly Ignorant?

Greetings. The Mutual UFO Network (MUFON) was once a legitimate investigative organization. Back in the 1970's, the organization worked alongside, but not in cooperation with, the Aerial Phenomena Research Organization (APRO) and the National Investigations Committee on Aerial Phenomena (NICAP.) By the 1990's, MUFON was the only game left in town, with APRO and NICAP having passed into UFO history. In recent years, the organization's focus has shifted away from UFO investigations towards the UFO entertainment industry and the nonsensical content it embraces. The organization has experienced several setbacks in recent years, self-inflicted wounds that tended to occur at the upper echelons of the organization, with the names Jan Harzan, John Ventre, and Steve Hudgeons immediately coming to mind. Despite this situation, there are several local chapters that have maintained a level of investigative focus and legitimacy, keeping the chaos of the higher organization at arm's