Skip to main content

A Faires Assessment.

Greetings. 

"...they want unsubstantiated claims, void of tangible evidence???"

"Who are you talking about? It would be great to have something substantial to prove what I have seen. I gave you a description of my best sighting, and could have told you a great amount of related details, but you didn't even give a react, much less ask for more info.

We, who see them as civilians, who are witness to their comings and goings and sometimes are their subjects of study, do not get to have proof of these things. It isn't allowed. The govt entities they make alliances with are the ones who have the proof, but of course THEY aren't allowed to divulge anything publicly either... And there is our conundrum...

You seem, most times, all too willing to be one who is enthusiastic about debunking the whole idea of alien visitation, and far too unwilling to just listen to what has actually happened, using your natural ability of discernment as a guide.

I find this very annoying about you. I find it to be uncharacteristic of one who seeks to know the truth. I find it more in line with those who wish to discount the possibility on the most narrow minded basis a human can have on this subject.

I find you to be very uninteresting, on this basis, and I doubt I'll follow you any longer. You have NOTHING to contribute to the subject matter, other than unreformed and unabated continual skepticism of the entire subject. I have NEVER seen you discuss any of the truly remarkable cases, or mass sightings. You act as well f those exist in a vacuum, unrelated to the current interest, or as if they don't exist at all.

You are boring."

The thoughts of Dennis R. Faires. This gentleman left behind the aforementioned comments on a recent blog posting on my platform on Facebook. He was clearly not happy with my points of view, my skeptical approach, or my thoughts on the UFO problem. That is par for the course in the UFO subculture. My response to Mr. Faires was as follows: 

"I did not respond to your sighting details because this is not a platform for reporting such alleged events. As far as your thoughts on the matters at hand, I respect your opinions. You are always welcome to not read my posts. Thank you Sir."

I will not return personal comments with the same kind of rhetoric. I keep it measured and professional at all times. However, Mr. Faires' comments did prove my point, specifically about the blog posting in question, which can be found at https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=pfbid02WHaA8zoRV7J7dLFE3iBE8F4UAtQvzWK7sBCR35BZ1vzHXBYgz3pgyXJtDLS75PsDl&id=100063229330941&mibextid=Nif5oz. His comments were personal in nature, and not civil or productive. Such comments are never conducive to meaningful interactions or discussions about any topics, including the UFO issue. 

I cannot stress strongly enough the need for civil, cordial, objective, and productive discussions, not just about UFOs, but about any topic. If we can't act like adults, then we have no hope of maturing as a species. 

Thank you for your time and consideration. 


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Liars, Frauds, and Misrepresenters.

Greetings. I am occasionally asked why I write about so many of the troubling issues within the UFO subculture. One reason, actually two. One, because the troubling issues exist, and I cannot in good conscience simply ignore them. Two, I am passionate about the UFO question, and I care deeply about the integrity of the entire UFO subculture, even though I am not an active participant in the movement.  There are many outstanding people involved in UFO research, individuals with integrity, an unshakable commitment to the work, and a high level of professionalism. They consistently grind the research stone in the never-ending effort to solve, or at the very least, learn about the UFO problem and it's innumerable questions. I cannot offer enough kind words of support and encouragement to those people, they are all deserving of our accolades, for they conduct their workmanlike efforts behind the scenes, without attention, out of the limelight, and beyond the prying eyes of the UFO subcu

Cringeworthy Promotion, Dolan Style.

Greetings. Mr. Richard Dolan is one of the most well-known figures in the UFO subculture. Known as a historian of the UFO topic, Mr. Dolan has commented at length about the UFO problem on various platforms, on broadcast media, during his own show, and on various social media outlets.  Mr. Dolan is a highly active participant on the UFO circuit, making appearances at many UFO themed festivals and conferences, actively promoting himself throughout. Now the simple act of promotion is not necessarily a negative course of action, but it is strongly suggestive of a change of course. In UFO circles, the act of self-promotion is a slippery slope, one that many well-known public figures have fallen into, some seemingly by accident, others by choice. Mr. Dolan seems to have chosen his course of action, and is apparently quite comfortable in his new surroundings.   Some UFO researchers have lost their professional credibility and integrity in the name of fame, notoriety, and financial gain. It ha

MUFON: Peddling Nonsense or Unknowingly Ignorant?

Greetings. The Mutual UFO Network (MUFON) was once a legitimate investigative organization. Back in the 1970's, the organization worked alongside, but not in cooperation with, the Aerial Phenomena Research Organization (APRO) and the National Investigations Committee on Aerial Phenomena (NICAP.) By the 1990's, MUFON was the only game left in town, with APRO and NICAP having passed into UFO history. In recent years, the organization's focus has shifted away from UFO investigations towards the UFO entertainment industry and the nonsensical content it embraces. The organization has experienced several setbacks in recent years, self-inflicted wounds that tended to occur at the upper echelons of the organization, with the names Jan Harzan, John Ventre, and Steve Hudgeons immediately coming to mind. Despite this situation, there are several local chapters that have maintained a level of investigative focus and legitimacy, keeping the chaos of the higher organization at arm's