Posts

Investigative Scientific "Integrity:" Unethical Behavior in the UFO Subculture.

-
Image
Greetings. Investigative scientific integrity. The dogged adherence to a set methodology, a highly professional course of action, or actions, which allow for an unbiased, legitimate, and dispassionate examination of an alleged event, or of an alleged witnesses' testimonial.  Scientific integrity is the condition which results from the strict and unwavering adherence to professional values, practices, and methodologies when conducting scientific activities that ensures clarity, objectivity, and reproducibility, while providing unassailable insulation from bias, fabrication, falsification, plagiarism, inappropriate influence(s,) political interference, and censorship. Quite a mouthful, but an essential one without question.  Investigative integrity, in my humble opinion, involves a far more personal set of ethics, standards, and methodologies. Maintaining one's own investigative integrity involves conducting one's self with honor, honesty, and distinction. It demands that the...
Post a Comment
Read more

Hitchens' Razor: Kyptonite for the Fringe Communities.

-
Image
Greetings. Hitchens' Razor. Hitchens' razor is an epistemological razor that serves as a general rule for rejecting certain knowledge claims. The razor states: "What can be asserted without evidence can also be dismissed without evidence." The razor is credited to author, critic, and journalist Christopher Eric Hitchens. It declares that the burden of proof regarding a claim lies squarely with the individual making the claim. If this burden is not satisfied, then the claim is deemed to be unfounded, and its opponents need not argue further in order to dismiss it. Hitchens used the phrase specifically in the context of refuting religious belief. The razor appears in Hitchens' magnificent 2007 book "God Is Not Great: How Religion Poisons Everything."  The term "Hitchens' Razor" itself made its first appearance in an online forum in October of 2007, and was later popularised by evolutionary biologist and atheist activist Jerry Coyne after Hitc...
Post a Comment
Read more

The Pitfalls of Witness Testimonials, Anecdotes at Work.

-
Image
Greetings. Witness testimonials. Accurate?  Not always.  Eyewitness testimony, anecdotal information, is historically among the most convincing forms of evidence in criminal procedures. In a majority of situations, only a suspect’s signed confession can further convince a jury about that specific individual’s guilt. The moment when a testifying witness points directly to the defendant as the perpetrator of the alleged crime is iconic, and has been dramatized hundreds of times on television and in motion pictures. We tend to trust our own perceptions and experiences. “I’ll believe it when I see it” isn’t just a historical cliché, it is a statement of the most persuasive form of evidence we allow. Such is the human condition.  Eyewitness testimony is more fallible than many people figure. The arrival of DNA analysis in the late 1980s revolutionized forensic science, providing an unprecedented level of accuracy about the identity of actual perpetrators versus innocent people...
Post a Comment
Read more